Even if Republicans pass 'skinny repeal,' their health-care push is most likely doomed
It's only purpose is to delay a final reckoning
The Republicans' great quest to kill ObamaCare has finally reached its endgame.
A Tuesday vote kicked off a legislative free-for-all, in which Senate Republicans will write their health-care bill by throwing stuff at the wall and seeing what sticks. That process will conclude any day now. And it looks like Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell already knows what the final product will be: the so-called "skinny repeal" bill.
Exactly what will be in the skinny repeal is still in flux. But the basic idea is minimalism: Stick to killing the limited parts of ObamaCare that are broadly unpopular and that most Republicans can agree they want gone. That would undoubtedly include scrapping the tax penalty that enforces ObamaCare's individual mandate. Other potential targets are the law's employer mandate and some of its taxes, as well as defunding Planned Parenthood and some sort of waiver to let states get out of certain regulations.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But even that lowest common denominator effort may not pass.
First, McConnell seems to have lost two GOP senators entirely. That gives him absolutely zero margin for error. He can't lose anyone else.
Second, Republicans are using a procedural move called "reconciliation" to move the bill through the Senate. It allows passage with simple 51-vote majorities, dodging the filibuster's 60-vote requirement. That allows Republicans to avoid any need to negotiate for Democrats' votes. But bills passed by reconciliation must restrict themselves to fiscal policy. And major parts of the proposed skinny repeal bill — like defunding Planned Parenthood and the regulatory waivers — have already been shot down by the Senate parliamentarian on those grounds.
On top of that, reconciliation bills must meet certain budget saving requirements. But most of the provisions under consideration for skinny repeal would lose the government revenue and expand the deficit. So that's giving the Republicans headaches too. And they have very little time left to sort it all out.
But let's say McConnell can jam together a version of skinny repeal that both passes muster with reconciliation and can pass the Senate. That still doesn't solve his most fundamental problem.
Without a doubt, President Trump would sign whatever trainwreck of an ObamaCare repeal bill the Republicans can get to his desk. But to actually do that, the House and the Senate must agree on one final legislative text. More specifically, the Republicans in the House and the Senate must agree on one final text. Democrats understandably won't be helping them.
Yet the version of TrumpCare the GOP managed to pass through the House looks nothing like the Senate's developing skinny repeal bill. The hardcore conservatives among House Republicans are well aware of this, and they're already saying skinny repeal won't cut it for them. Meanwhile, the closest thing the Senate has to the House version of TrumpCare is the version McConnell and his lieutenants spent a few months crafting — and that failed spectacularly on Tuesday, with nine Senate Republicans jumping ship.
So the party has yet to come up with any sort of bill that workable majorities in the House and the Senate can agree on. Their best hope now is that the raw peer pressure to pass something, anything, is enough to keep everyone in line.
At root, the GOP's problem is this: Americans want lower premiums, lower deductibles, generous coverage, and less hassle overall from their health insurance. In fact, Medicaid is strikingly popular with the general public — much more so than the private plans sold on ObamaCare's exchanges — for precisely these reasons. But achieving any of those results requires some combination of tighter regulation on private insurance and more government spending on either premium subsidies or Medicaid or both. And "more regulation and more spending" is precisely what the GOP is dead set against.
There is no way for the party to deliver the health-care results voters want while also sticking by all its ideological priors. It cannot be done. Something must give. This has always been the existential crisis at the heart of the GOP's long quest to kill ObamaCare. And the GOP has never squarely faced it. Everything the party has done until now — including McConnell's supposedly brilliant procedural stratagems — has been one long exercise in delaying that final and inevitable reckoning.
That contradiction has also forced the Republicans into relentless deception throughout this entire drama. They've ripped ObamaCare for rising premiums and higher deductibles, then pushed a set of policy changes that would make those problems worse. They've indulged in a partisan closed-door process far worse than the most absurd caricatures of ObamaCare. They've claimed massive cuts to Medicaid won't result in coverage losses for its beneficiaries. Supposedly principled moderates like John McCain have slammed their own party's bills on substantive and procedural grounds — and then voted for them anyway.
The skinny repeal is of a piece with this nonsense. Let's say it's just a placeholder, to be replaced by totally new legislation when the Senate and House meet in conference. The most likely end result will be something close to the previous versions of TrumpCare, complete with higher premiums, higher deductibles, less aid for Americans, and massive cuts to Medicaid. All of which the Senate's moderate Republicans are already on record opposing. On the other hand, if skinny repeal itself actually became law, it would destabilize the individual insurance markets and cause premiums to spike — precisely the result Republicans say they're trying to avoid by repealing ObamaCare.
Either way, there's no reason the GOP moderates should sign on. Skinny repeal won't go anywhere that's consistent with their expressed values. Yet it may very well squeak through the Senate, because in the end skinny repeal is just one more desperate attempt to kick the can a little further down the road.
But ultimately, the Republicans must either commit themselves to a monstrous bill Americans will hate or abandon their quest — and thereby confess that their seven-year campaign against ObamaCare, and all their promises of something better, was nothing but showboating and snake oil salesmanship. Those are their only two options. There are no others.
And very soon, the GOP will finally have to pick.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Jeff Spross was the economics and business correspondent at TheWeek.com. He was previously a reporter at ThinkProgress.
-
'Stormy Monday for Don'
Today's Newspapers A roundup of the headlines from the US front pages
By The Week Staff Published
-
6 queer poets to read whenever but especially now
The Week Recommends April is National Poetry Month
By Scott Hocker, The Week US Published
-
How women's pain is often ignored in health care
the explainer The gap in care is especially glaring compared to how men are treated
By Theara Coleman, The Week US Published
-
Arizona court reinstates 1864 abortion ban
Speed Read The law makes all abortions illegal in the state except to save the mother's life
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Trump, billions richer, is selling Bibles
Speed Read The former president is hawking a $60 "God Bless the USA Bible"
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published