It seems that no one thought Rex Tillerson was a good secretary of state — not the career diplomats who have fled from their jobs at the State Department on his watch, not the foreign policy analysts who have pointed to his poor management of the department and clumsy dealings with foreign governments and dignitaries, and not the president himself, who had griped about Tillerson's performance for months and then summarily fired him via a tweet on Tuesday morning.
Mike Pompeo, Director of the CIA, will become our new Secretary of State. He will do a fantastic job! Thank you to Rex Tillerson for his service! Gina Haspel will become the new Director of the CIA, and the first woman so chosen. Congratulations to all!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) March 13, 2018
Sec. Tillerson says he got a call from Pres. Trump on AF1 around noon, about three hours after Trump announced his firing via tweet.
— Monica Alba (@albamonica) March 13, 2018
The most noteworthy thing about the transition at the State Department is not Tillerson's departure itself or the pending appointment of CIA Director Mike Pompeo as his successor — or, for that matter, the pending appointment of CIA deputy director Gina Haspel to take over for Pompeo in Langley, Virginia.
The most noteworthy thing about this staff shakeup is the way it was handled. As always, it was a confusing morass of lies, distortions, and contradictions. This is important.
Where other administrations have aimed, if not always for transparency, then at least for consistency across the executive branch, the Trump White House fails to maintain even the most minimal levels of stability or coherence. To gauge how far it diverges from established norms of professionalism, imagine how Tillerson's dismissal likely would have unfolded in any other administration.
For months the president has publicly expressed displeasure and disagreement with his own secretary of state. To wit:
...Save your energy Rex, we'll do what has to be done!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 1, 2017
In such a situation, where everyone in a normal administration knows a Cabinet official just isn't working out, there would have been a quietly coordinated departure, with Trump and Tillerson releasing harmonious statements that described the decision as amicable. "It was time for me to move on," the secretary would have said, and the world would have shrugged its shoulders and focused attention on evaluating his likely successor.
Obviously, that didn't happen.
So let's assume another possibility — that Tillerson was summarily fired, as some have speculated, for his relatively harsh statement on Monday blaming Russia for a nerve gas attack in the U.K. Even in this more ominous case, another administration would have worked with Tillerson to ensure coordination. The White House would have issued a statement thanking Tillerson for his service but making plain that his recent statements had gotten too far out ahead of the administration's position, and so he had been asked to step down. Tillerson would then have issued his own statement saying that he serves at the pleasure of the president and that it's been an honor and privilege to serve his country.
This would have been hugely controversial in the context of the U.K. attack and the special counsel's ongoing Russia investigation. But at least the public would have understood something of the truth of the administration's motives, which could then be debated and judged in the court of public opinion.
But this didn't happen either.
Instead, the White House claims Tillerson was informed last week that he was on the way out. Tillerson claims that this morning's firing came as a complete surprise. And now the official who made this statement on Tillerson's behalf (Undersecretary of State Steve Goldstein) has been fired for contradicting the White House on the matter.
Where in all of this chaos is the truth? When was the decision made to fire Tillerson? And what was the motive? We can speculate, but we will most likely never know for sure. Trump's defenders in the right-wing media will fasten onto the most benign possibilities and run with them, while others will emphasize more sinister alternatives, and neither will be able to refute the other's assertions because there will be evidence to support each side — and a very long track record of blatant, almost flamboyant lying from the White House to undercut the trustworthiness of anything the president or his aides and advisers say on the matter.
Is the chaos deliberate? Perhaps. But it's far more likely that it's a product of a systemic sloppiness that merely serves Trump's interests — as it would serve the interests of any would-be authoritarian. When no one can know for certain what's happening or why, those in positions of power increase their freedom of movement and action. Democratic accountability requires the ability of citizens to become informed about the behavior of those in charge and assess it. But this becomes impossible when what's happening takes place behind a smokescreen of lies, contradictions, and outright disinformation.
With Tillerson's chaotic departure on Tuesday, the United States slid just a little bit further in the direction of despotism. The secretary of state was fired, no one really knows when or why, and there's nothing that anyone can do about it.