×
See you in court
June 11, 2019

Ten state attorneys general on Tuesday sued to block the merger of T-Mobile and Sprint, saying the $26 billion deal would result in consumers paying more for their wireless phone plans, with low-income and minority customers hit the hardest.

This is "exactly the sort of consumer-harming, job-killing mega merger our antitrust laws were designed to prevent," New York Attorney General Letitia James (D) said. T-Mobile, the third-largest wireless company in the U.S., and Sprint, which follows in the No. 4 spot, announced the proposed merger in April 2018, and said the goal was to get the deal approved by July 2019.

T-Mobile and Sprint say that by coming together, they'll be able to expand the country's 5G network. Last month, Federal Communications Commission Chair Ajit Pai said the merger would close "the digital divide in rural America" while "advancing United States leadership in 5G." It's believed FCC commissioners will vote on the merger soon, and the Justice Department is expected to make its decision on the merger sometime in the next few weeks, The New York Times reports. Catherine Garcia

June 11, 2019

House Democrats are turning their subpoena threats up another notch.

On Tuesday, the House voted 229-191 on a resolution to take its subpoenas of Attorney General William Barr and former White House counsel Don McGahn to federal court. The party line vote will let the House Judiciary Committee challenge Barr and McGahn's noncompliance with the committee's requests for their testimonies and documents, but doesn't formally charge the two with contempt.

As NPR puts it, Tuesday's vote "clears the way for more lawsuits against Cabinet departments, administration officials, bankers, accountants, and more." But it also represents a retreat from previous promises to hold Barr in contempt after he failed to show up for a House hearing last month. It also pales in comparison to some Democrats' calls to impeach Barr altogether.

The move comes just a day after Judiciary Chair Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) announced he'd reached a deal with the DOJ to see previously withheld "key evidence" from the Mueller report. Nadler said in a Monday release that he'd give the DOJ time to comply with the deal before moving to "enforce our subpoena in court," but that didn't seem to apply to the subpoenas issued directly to Barr and McGahn that were in question Tuesday. Kathryn Krawczyk

June 3, 2019

The Trump Organization is being sued by the owner of a Panama City hotel, who alleges the company "made fraudulent and false claims to the Panamanian tax authorities" in order to "cover up its unlawful activities."

The Trump International Hotel and Tower opened in Panama City in 2011, and the Trump Organization was set to manage the property through 2031, The New York Times reports. In 2017, a businessman named Orestes Fintiklis bought 202 of the hotel's 369 units, and soon after took the Trump Organization to court, saying the hotel was struggling financially due to the company's mismanagement. In 2018, the Trump Organization was removed as managers, and the property is now a JW Marriott.

In a legal filing made Monday in Manhattan, Fintiklis and his companies allege that the tax evasion scheme was discovered in 2018 when Panamanian tax authorities conducted an audit. The filing also claims the Trump Organization did not pay taxes on fees it collected for managing the hotel's daily operations and underreported employee salaries to the Panamanian social security agency, possibly to reduce social security tax payments, the Times reports. Combined, these actions made "the financial and operational performance of the hotel appear in a false light," the filing said.

Fintiklis and his companies are seeking $35 million in damages, while the Trump Organization argues it is owed at least $3 million since being ousted as the property managers. The Trump Organization did not respond to the Times' request for comment. Catherine Garcia

May 29, 2019

A judge has ordered Boris Johnson, who has been seen as the top contender to replace Theresa May as British Prime Minister, to appear in court and face allegations he lied about Brexit.

Johnson, former U.K. foreign secretary, has been accused of misleading the public by falsely claiming that it cost Britain £350 million per week to maintain membership in the European Union ahead of the 2016 Brexit vote, CNN reports. This claim was made while Johnson was campaigning for Britain to leave the European Union, and it appeared on a campaign bus.

Johnson has been ordered to face a private summons of three counts of alleged misconduct in office; the judge had been asked to summon Johnson as part of a private prosecution case, The New York Times reports. Johnson "repeatedly lied and misled the British public as to the cost of EU membership," the application against him alleges, Reuters reports.

The Westminster Magistrate's Court judge said that the allegations against Johnson have not been proven but decided that "this is a proper case to issue the summons," meaning Johnson has been ordered to court for a preliminary hearing before the case can be sent to trial. Johnson's lawyers have dismissed the application as a stunt, NBC News reports, also saying that "none of the acts" that have been alleged took place "in the course of Mr. Johnson's direct parliamentary or mayoral duties" but instead during "the course of political campaigning." Brendan Morrow

May 24, 2019

Alabama's restrictive new abortion law has just prompted a federal lawsuit from Planned Parenthood and the American Civil Liberties Union.

The two organizations announced the filing of this lawsuit on Friday, with Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, a senior staff attorney at the ACLU Reproductive Freedom Project, arguing in a statement that the new law is "blatantly unconstitutional."

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of abortion providers in the state, with a doctor from the Alabama Women's Center arguing in the filing that the law "directly conflicts with Roe and more than four decades of Supreme Court precedent affirming its central holding," The Washington Post reports.

Alabama's new law, which was signed by Gov. Kay Ivey (R) last week, makes performing nearly all abortion a felony in the state except in cases where the mother's health is at risk or where the fetus has a "lethal anomaly," with no exception for rape or incest. Doctors who perform abortions could be punished with up to 99 years in prison. The law will not actually go into effect until 2020, however.

The law has received significant pushback even among some Republicans, with Republican National Committee Chair Ronna McDaniel saying she personally supports exceptions for rape and incest. President Trump also tweeted on Saturday that he too supports exceptions for rape and incest but that the party must stay "united."

Upon signing the Alabama law, Ivey signaled that it would inevitably face legal challenges, saying it provides the Supreme Court an "opportunity" to "revisit" Roe v. Wade. Brendan Morrow

April 22, 2019

President Trump is suing to block House Democrats' subpoena of his financial statements.

Trump and the Trump Organization have filed a lawsuit against House Oversight Committee Chairman Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) over his recent subpoena of the president's accounting firm, The Washington Post reports. The filing accuses Democrats of waging an "all-out political war" against Trump and using subpoenas as their "weapon of choice," per Axios.

Cummings had previously requested financial records from an accounting firm Trump and his business have used, Mazars USA, and this lawsuit seeks to block the subpoena. The subpoena was issued after Trump's former lawyer, Michael Cohen, testified that the president in the past has inflated his wealth on financial statements, with Cummings seeking to corroborate these claims, per Politico.

The suit says that the subpoena from Democrats "lacks any legitimate legislative purpose, is an abuse of power, and is just another example of overreach by the president's political opponents," per NBC News. Cummings has not yet responded, but he previously said per The Wall Street Journal that his committee has "full authority to investigate whether the president may have engaged in illegal conduct before and during his tenure in office." Brendan Morrow

April 9, 2019

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) has filed yet another defamation lawsuit.

The California congressman this time is suing the McClatchy newspaper company over its reporting on him, The New York Times reports. His lawsuit takes particular issue with an article in The Fresno Bee about a server who had sued a winery that Nunes is an investor in, saying that on a cruise with its top investors she was asked to work, prostitutes were hired and guests used cocaine. The article said it was unclear whether Nunes was affiliated with the event.

Nunes in his lawsuit is asking for $150 million and the deletion of the article, claiming it was published in order to defame him and interfere with his work on the House Intelligence Committee, which he was the chair of at the time. The Fresno Bee said on Monday that Nunes never actually asked them for a correction to the article, though. The original article states he did not return requests for comment. In a statement, McClatchy said Nunes' claim is "wholly without merit and we stand behind the strong reporting of The Fresno Bee."

This is just the latest defamation lawsuit from Nunes after he previously filed a $250 million lawsuit against Twitter, alleging it shadow bans conservatives and allowed users like @DevinCow to harass him.

Although Nunes spoke in detail about the lawsuit on Fox News' on Monday, the network's legal analyst, Andrew Napolitano, said on Tuesday he likely has no case, saying that public figures "never win" lawsuits like these. Brendan Morrow

March 18, 2019

Rep. Devin Nunes (R-Calif.) sued Twitter for $250 million on Monday, alleging that the social media platform "shadow banned" conservatives, including himself, ahead of the 2018 midterms, Fox News reports.

Shadow banning is described as purposely making a user's content undiscoverable to everyone except the original poster, without their knowledge; Twitter had repeatedly denied ever shadow banning any user. His lawyers allege Nunes was shadow banned in 2018 "in order to restrict his free speech," adding that access to Twitter "is essential for meaningful participation in modern-day American democracy" and a "candidate without Twitter is a losing candidate. The ability to use Twitter is a vital part of modern citizenship."

The suit, filed in Virginia state court, also claims Twitter wanted to interfere with Nunes' work when he was still chair of the House Intelligence Committee, and allowed users with Twitter handles like "@DevinNunesMom" to harass him. "In her endless barrage of tweets, Devin Nunes' Mom maliciously attacked every aspect of Nunes' character, honesty, integrity, ethics, and fitness to perform his duties as a United States congressman," the suit claims.

This is one of several users named in the complaint, accused of forcing Nunes to endure "an orchestrated defamation campaign of stunning breadth and scope, one that no human being should ever have to bear and suffer in their whole life." Nunes is asking that Twitter reveal the identities of those users. Catherine Garcia

See More Speed Reads